Видео

@@lonzeponze I can't remember the approach speed but the main thing is that if the autopilot wants to slow down, you need to help it with the spoilers. Otherwise the angle of attack gets to high.

Thanks for subscribing.

I have studied computer science, but I am not a professional game developer. This game is a hobby thing :)

Yes, will merge it into github.com/wedesoft/sfsim soon. I am using the LWJGL bindings for OpenGL (same as Minecraft Java Edition) with Clojure.

@@wedesoft Interesting stuff

You are right, just had a look at an AoE2 video.

Well If I am not mistaken aoe4 had arrow physics from aoe2 but ppl screwed that it makes archers useless

Ok have fun :)

Sorry, no. I think you can buy a metal version these days.

Ok, found it. It is actually an aluminium version: alexnld.com/product/kdx-diy-6dof-aluminum-robot-arm-6-axis-rotating-mechanical-robot-arm-kit-with-6-pcs-servo/

Actually i would like to make it by myself on 3d printer, anyway thank you man 🔥💪

@@otabekbaratov117 Maybe Thor is something for you: thor.angel-lm.com/

Lua is a great choice already. Myself I recommend Clojure for high-level and C for low-level. Also Rust might be interesting for low-level stuff, but I haven't looked into it myself.

lol

😂

Fortunately the Assimp library generated the tangent space vectors for me :-D

​@@wedesoftThe assimp library is a model loading library, it loads in the model as a tree/graph that you can traverse and get data, it just loads in existing normal map info no? how can it generate normal information?

@@mastershooter64 Assimp can load different texture types from glTF and a normals texture is one of them. You have to bake it in Blender though.

​@@mastershooter64It also has a flag when loading to generate the tangents and bitangents. Not sure whether it generates the mesh normals as well.

Yes, a lot of detail to get lost in :-)

@@wedesoftyeah, there are a lot of details and mechanics, but he point of that message was that this game so good, complex and time consuming, once you understand it’s full potential, all mechanics, you wouldn’t play any game ‘cuz they are too boring, especially about painting maps like civil

@@wedesoftso don’t drop the game if it’s getting too difficult, everyone went through this phase of studying

​@@SnufchaYes, I played Civ 6 before and EU4 looks like it has much more elaborate game mechanics. I am so far enjoying it, playing the more beginner friendly Castille :)

See github.com/wedesoft/arduino-sainsmart for part list. I used a 6V 3A (18W) power supply to plug into the DFRobot servo shield (edit: corrected power supply spec).

uk.rs-online.com/web/p/ac-dc-adapters/7424762 is the link to the 6V 3A power supply but it is discontinued. Basically need 0.5A per servo and a suitable connector.

In the part list you'll find a DC connector which I used to connect the power supply to the IO expansion shield (soldered some wires to the DC connector to connect to the screw terminal).

If you ever get it to the point where scattering produces a "Belt of Venus" on the opposing horizon (see Sky at Night magazine), then we can say the physics is right!

Ok, fixed the error in the title. Thanks.

@@Cedders001 Ok, interesting. I increased the brightness but I didn't observe a pronounced pink belt. Even if I manage to reproduce it, the implementation is still missing the ozone layer which is somewhat important to simulating views of the sky I read.

Not sure. I have implemented scattering using Bruneton's paper. I.e. using precomputed tables for scattering and transmittance.

I have uploaded a new video which uses separate tables for Mie and Rayleigh scattering. ruclips.net/video/MDgcWxnTJSg/видео.html

@@wedesoft Thanks. That looks more realistic to me. Looking at the images in Bruneton, maybe the tables are a bit off or just lack clouds or dust or polarisation effects. The way the halo bows up as the sun rises (multiple Rayleigh scattering?) is very pronounced, and the sky looks too saturated. In a real sky, I can see that 20° elevation is whiter than 30°. How high is the viewpoint above the plane and does that make a difference?

@@Cedders001 Yes, very pronounced halo. I didn't record the height. With greater height, the white band at the horizon is less pronounced. Although I have developed the software using test driven development, maybe there is still a bug in there.

Sorry, hab keinen C++ code dafür.

The fine detail looks good, but as you say the shape (and distribution) of clouds isn't exactly cumulus - some fractal function applied to the vertical profile? (I'm mostly here for the physics.)

@@Cedders001 The software had a bug when generating this video. See www.wedesoft.de/software/2023/05/03/volumetric-clouds/ for updated description and video. Note that this is just procedural generation of clouds and not proper wheather physics.

github.com/wedesoft/sfsim25/blob/d64b0231ab674b65d41ca37d3821a9d78def2a5e/etc/cloudsonly.clj

Dense cloud cover was rendering at 20 fps, scattered clouds was 8 fps only. Note that I have a lower-end graphics card (passmark 2034). The clouds are in a shell around a planetary scale sphere. The coverage is the same everywhere at the moment (I have other videos about generating coverage maps using curl noise).

The performance also goes down if the sun is near the horizon because then the light rays travel a longer distance in the cloud layer.

@@wedesoft Thanks. Nice work.

Resolution was 960x540 btw.

@@wedesoft The noise resolution or the render resolution?

lol

Maybe it needs to be a bit larger but real pictures show this as well: www.taylordailypress.net/wp-content/uploads/2021/10/1633060755_Breathtaking-photos-of-Earth-were-captured-from-above-even-from.jpg